Whereas Prop 22 ensures staff some protections, corresponding to 120 % of the native minimal wage for every hour spent driving, a medical health insurance stipend, and reimbursement for job-related accidents, it’s removed from the complete vary of advantages Uber, Lyft, DoorDash, Instacart, and different companies would’ve had to offer if staff have been categorized as staff.
Uber, Lyft, and DoorDash have all issued responses in help of the courtroom’s resolution. “From the second it turned regulation, Prop 22 has been working for the tens of millions of drivers and couriers that earn on platforms like ours,” Uber writes in a put up on its web site. “Uber alone has delivered greater than $1 billion in direct advantages up to now.”
Opponents of Prop 22 are annoyed with the end result. “We’re deeply dissatisfied that the state Supreme Court docket has allowed tech firms to purchase their means out of primary labor legal guidelines regardless of Proposition 22’s inconsistencies with our state structure,” Lorena Gonzalez, the president of the California Federation of Labor Unions, says in a statement posted online. “These firms have upended our social contract, forcing staff and the general public to tackle the inherent danger created by this work, whereas they revenue.”
Different places, corresponding to Massachusetts, Minneapolis, and New York City, have established some safety for Uber, Lyft, and DoorDash drivers, however they’re nonetheless categorized as contractors.
